The 2025 Hungarian Grand Prix was supposed to be a landmark moment for McLaren, celebrating their 200th Grand Prix victory. A dominant one-two finish seemed to solidify their place at the top of the Constructors’ Championship. But for Oscar Piastri, what should have been a day of celebration instead turned sour. Despite leading the race with a commanding performance, a series of questionable strategic calls saw his race unravel, with teammate Lando Norris ultimately taking the victory. This outcome, just one in a growing series of results, has raised suspicions about McLaren’s treatment of its two title-contending drivers. Is McLaren truly playing fair, or is there more at play behind the scenes? This is a story of team dynamics, strategy, and the growing tension at McLaren.

Piastri’s Strong Start and the Turning Point

Oscar Piastri’s performance in Hungary was nothing short of impressive. The Australian driver built an 8-second lead over Norris, demonstrating clear control and exceptional pace. It seemed like he was on track to secure another victory in his rising F1 career. However, just as it appeared that Piastri’s first-ever Hungarian Grand Prix victory was within his grasp, the strategy calls from McLaren began to tilt the race in Norris’s favor.

Piastri was called in for a second pit stop, which put him on a two-stop strategy that ultimately cost him valuable time — more than 20 seconds. Norris, on the other hand, stayed out longer, executing a one-stop strategy that allowed him to leapfrog his teammate and take the win. On the surface, this seemed like another strategic split between teammates, a common occurrence in F1. However, for those paying attention to the subtleties, this was the third time in as many races that Norris had benefited from smarter, or at least more opportunistic, team decisions.

What was particularly damning for Piastri was the realization that the one-stop strategy was never truly considered for him. After the race, he admitted that the one-stop option wasn’t even really discussed on his side of the garage. Meanwhile, Norris was given the freedom to gamble on a strategy that he felt had nothing to lose. This disparity in strategic decision-making began to raise eyebrows.

The Leaked Conversation and What It Implies

The situation grew even more suspicious when a conversation between Norris and a McLaren strategist was leaked to the press. In this unrecorded exchange, Norris reportedly thanked the strategist, saying, “Thanks for backing the call. I knew it would work if we played it right.” The response from the strategist was even more telling: “It was always the better shot for the championship.”

That line, “for the championship,” struck a chord in the paddock. It implied something far more significant than just a clever race strategy. It suggested prioritization, it suggested favoritism, and it implied that Norris’s title bid was being subtly supported by the team. This conversation, whether it was intentional or not, has sparked a massive debate within F1 circles. Is McLaren backing Lando Norris in their title fight at the expense of Piastri? It raises a crucial question: can McLaren maintain the façade of neutrality between their two drivers, or is there a clear, unspoken favoritism at play?

McLaren’s Team Dynamics: Favoritism or Strategy?

McLaren has long touted the idea that they have no number one driver. CEO Zak Brown has frequently stated that the team races each other fairly, with the two drivers on equal footing and no preferential treatment. The philosophy on paper sounds ideal: two young, talented drivers, equal machinery, and the freedom to race each other without interference. However, history has shown that such a balance rarely lasts in Formula 1.

As the pressure mounts, teams often begin to favor consistency, loyalty, and marketability — values that are, arguably, more valuable than pure on-track performance. In this case, Lando Norris ticks all those boxes. He has been with McLaren through their rebuilding phase, has built a strong relationship with the team, and is a fan favorite with a large commercial appeal. Furthermore, he’s British, driving for a British team — the PR benefits of Norris winning the championship are undeniable.

On the other hand, Oscar Piastri is still the outsider, despite his immense talent. In his second season in F1, Piastri has shown that he can compete with the best, including Norris. However, his relatively short tenure in F1 and his quiet, unassuming demeanor mean that he is not yet as marketable or ingrained in the McLaren brand as Norris. As much as Piastri is an exceptional driver, there’s a sense that he could be seen as a threat, rather than an asset, to Norris’s championship aspirations.

Norris’s Calm Exterior vs. Piastri’s Growing Frustration

What’s fascinating about this developing rivalry is how each driver is handling it. Lando Norris has consistently framed the season as a personal journey, stating that he doesn’t enjoy mind games and simply wants to race and enjoy the experience. He insists that his wins should come from performance, not political games.

However, Norris’s calm, friendly, and philosophical demeanor might be his greatest weapon. By maintaining a seemingly conflict-free public image, he avoids the appearance of stirring tensions, even as the strategic calls continue to fall in his favor. It’s the F1 equivalent of smiling while stabbing someone with a spoon.

Piastri, meanwhile, has started to show cracks in his composure. In the aftermath of the Hungarian Grand Prix, he expressed frustration, hinting at a growing sense of resignation. He acknowledged that he might look back on the season and wonder what could have been done differently. The title battle that once seemed to be his to lose is now slipping through his fingers due to circumstances beyond his control.

The numbers tell a clear story. Had Piastri’s race been handled differently in Silverstone and Hungary, he would now be 37 points ahead of Norris, not just nine. A single DNF (Did Not Finish) or another strategic misstep could see him fall behind Norris, effectively ending his title challenge.

The Growing Internal Struggle at McLaren

With just 10 races remaining in the 2025 season, the story of the year isn’t just about McLaren’s potential to win the Constructors’ Championship — that seems a given. The real question is whether McLaren will allow the battle between Norris and Piastri to play out cleanly, or if the team will subtly — or not so subtly — back Norris in the pursuit of the title.

The implications are huge. If Piastri continues to suffer from unfavorable strategy calls, tensions within the team will inevitably boil over. Piastri has been calm and measured so far, but it’s only a matter of time before he becomes increasingly frustrated by the circumstances holding him back.

What happens if the next strategy call backfires? What if McLaren is forced to choose sides? We’ve seen these rivalries play out before: Hamilton vs. Rosberg, Vettel vs. Webber, Alonso vs. Hamilton. These rivalries often start with mutual respect, but they end in fractured relationships within the team.

The Future of the 2025 World Championship

At this point, McLaren finds itself on a razor’s edge. One more misstep, one poorly executed strategy call, or one radio message taken the wrong way could ignite a full-scale internal battle. And while the 2025 championship seemed like it was going to be about Red Bull, Mercedes, or Ferrari, it now seems that the title will be decided within the McLaren garage itself.

So, what do you think? Has McLaren betrayed Oscar Piastri, or is this simply elite team strategy at work? The 2025 World Championship may be decided not just by the drivers on track, but by who McLaren chooses to stand behind in the end.

Full Video: